HISID board chooses Rogers law firm

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

HOLIDAY ISLAND -- In a surprise vote Monday, the Holiday Island Board of Commissioners approved 4-1, Chairman Linda Graves dissenting, to pursue a contract with the Slinkard Law Firm of Rogers for legal services for the suburban improvement district. Slinkard was chosen as one of three finalists submitting Requests for Qualifications. Attorneys from two other firms, Matt Bishop of Eureka Springs and Kutak Rock of Little Rock, also responded to RFQs.

Howard L. Slinkard, the firm's principal, was chosen over attorneys Thomas Kieklak of Harrington Miller and Tom Morris and Associates, the district's current attorney.

The Ad Hoc Committee - Legal Services looked at several considerations in the RFQ process, among them whether the firm was qualified to represent the district at the Supreme Court level, how quickly the attorney would respond to calls and how much experience the attorney had with suburban improvement districts.

Morris, who was the third finalist interviewed by the commissioners shortly before they made their decision, began working with Holiday Island in 1988 and became the district's full time attorney in 1995.

Kieklak had experience with the district in the recent Table Rock Landing and Bischoff lawsuits.

District Manager Dennis Kelly said it was a "subjective decision," but he felt Slinkard could be eliminated and said he felt comfortable with either of "the two Toms."

The board did not agree on eliminating Slinkard's firm.

"I liked Slinkard, with all his experience representing cities," said Greg Davis.

Slinkard had also represented one improvement district.

Graves said she was concerned about the other lawyers in Slinkard's firm being "out of law school in the last couple years and not having a lot of experience. I wonder how much backup he'd have."

Kelly cautioned the board that even though they are looking at law firms, they would be hiring the individual.

"Whoever we hire will be the go-to attorney," he said.

The next step will be to negotiate a contract. If the district cannot reach an agreement with Slinkard on fees and other stipulations, the board has the option of choosing one of the other firms with which to negotiate.

The board opened up for discussion the marina contract, which ends Dec. 31. Under the most recent terms of the current contract with Allan and Brenda Krier of Marina Concessions, which they have held for 15 years, they lease the marina property for $1 per year but currently pay the district 45 percent, capped at $75,000, of the gross revenues from their operation of 172 of the 192 boat slips, and pay for utilities and other overhead costs. They keep all revenue from eight covered and 12 uncovered nightly rental boat slips and any income from activities such as boat rentals, retail sales and services. The district handles maintenance and repairs to the property, including the docks.

Commissioners have been wondering whether it would be better for the district to operate the entire marina and keep all the income, or lease just the operation of the concession.

Graves handed out an analysis comparing these two options, some of which she took from an analysis done in 2009 by a former district manager, some of whose figures she questioned.

Some of the problems with the district hiring an employee to operate the marina were raised, such as supervision, the costs of setting up a concession and whether anyone would bid just to run the concession.

"I can't see why someone wouldn't come in for concessions only," said Commissioner David Makidon. "We're not collecting anything now [on concessions], and we're paying $65,000 just to keep [the Kriers] there."

Others pointed out there is more to running the marina than they realize.

"You have to have decals on the boats and insurance available at all times for the Corps to look at," said property owner Vernon Anderson. "You have to keep track of the docks and slips coming available."

Kelly will come up with Requests for Proposals for full operation of the marina and also for an alternative of operating just the concession.

"I think Allan and Brenda have done a real good job, and the only reason we're looking at it is as an opportunity to get more income for the district," Graves said.

In other business, the board:

* Approved Regulation 23-2002, Amendment 3 on second reading, which is the final approval. The amendment deals with election procedures.

* Heard the district manager's and department head reports, including information on sludge processing, leak detection and repair and the tree cutting program.

* Reviewed the district's six-month Statement of Revenue and Expenditures, including a year-end estimate. As of the end of June, the district shows $2.8 million in revenue and $1.5 million in expenses, for a net revenue of $1.3 million, not including capital expenditures. The board called for a revised document for the next meeting.

View 7 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Well the village IDIOTS are at it again.You people have no idea what it takes to run a marina. Graves you need to keep your analysis and yourself at HOME. If you are really serious about wanting to make more money for H.I. why don't you close the 9 hole golf course and then lease out the 18 hole.That in itself will save appx. 1/2 MILLION DOLLARS. Graves only idea was to increase the assessment again. Why don't you change the rules where non residents can run for the BOC as long as they are close enough to be able to attend the meetings. I would love to run but I'm not a golfer. That is one of the prerequisites is it not?

    -- Posted by property owner on Tue, Aug 26, 2014, at 12:30 PM
  • The $65,000 comes from the slip rentals..........

    Concessions would include the sale of gas, soft drinks, oil, batteries, ice and everything else that's in the marina shop...Concessions would also include all income from boat rentals owned by the tenant.........Additional concession income would include money collected for the rental of the slips reserved for the tenant..............

    That would be a great deal for the district to keep all the slip rentals and lease out the concessions........ The $65,000 would be the same income that the district would get if they collected assessments on an additional 150 lots.........

    -- Posted by LITTLE DOZER on Wed, Aug 27, 2014, at 5:24 AM
  • Just one major problem. Alan owns the boats and other equipment that is rented out. So who is going to buy all new boats to replace Alan's? Next question is who is going to maintain all of this equipment. I guess Graves answer would be to up the assessments and buy everything.

    -- Posted by property owner on Wed, Aug 27, 2014, at 1:02 PM
  • I would be interested to know if any of the BOC ever reads these comments. It certainly wouldn't hurt for them to.

    -- Posted by property owner on Wed, Aug 27, 2014, at 1:04 PM
  • I'm not sure why we are visiting the finances of the marina, but not the golf courses. Closing of the nine hole and turning it into a Park to be enjoyed by all residents, would save more money then messing with the marina.

    A Park with riding/walking paths, gazebo's shelters, community gardens and well maintained, would offer those looking at H.I., as a possible home, another choice instead of what is going to have to change anyway.

    This community with the exception of the sand fleas, cannot continue to absorb the heavy debt and increased water rates and assessments, that as with the last increase, will not be used for the infrastructure. Until the right agency in government investigates or a lawsuit for criminal neglect for what the people on the BOC were elected to do as in their job description, our infrastructure will continue to deteriorate.

    The marina issue is just a distraction, to eliminate the focus of the real issue, the deficit!

    -- Posted by Concerned Person on Thu, Aug 28, 2014, at 12:58 PM
  • wanting new lawyers with a history in SID's tells me one thing. They are wanting to circumvent the "Rule and Regulations" and run H.I. as they wish, with enforcement power.

    No wonder property doesn't sell here! Who wants to live in a community operated by a BOC such as this. And who wants to pay high assessments and water rates with nothing but 2 golf course, bad roads and 80% water loss to show for it?

    -- Posted by Concerned Person on Thu, Aug 28, 2014, at 1:12 PM
  • "I liked Slinkard, with all his experience representing cities," said Greg Davis.

    Would someone tell Mr. Davis, we are not a city! We will never be a city, with the golf mentality that exists here.

    -- Posted by Concerned Person on Sun, Aug 31, 2014, at 4:18 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: