|
|
Fair ~ High: 90°F ~ Low: 59°F |
|
Good Old Boys...and Bad Old BoysPosted Tuesday, June 29, 2010, at 2:21 PM
It seems almost certain that Berryville's Tim McKinney will run for another term as mayor. As you may know, I am in favor of that and for the same reason McKinney gives: the next four years are going to be tough ones and it is a poor time to bring in inexperienced leadership. On balance I also think McKinney has been a good mayor and, consequently, I intend to vote for him.
That said, isn't it really too bad that there is such a leadership vacuum in Berryville, and in Carroll County generally? So far, only one person has approached me for a signature that--along with 29 other signatures--will allow him to throw his hat in the ring for mayor. I gladly signed his petition because I believe that effective democracy is part horse race, but I was less than impressed with his reasons for running: "I don't drink and I don't do drugs," he said. That's a deficient platform. Any dead person in the Berryville cemetery can make that claim. So can Sophie, my Jack Russell Terrier. But I'm not going to vote for her until she can articulate why our brand new City Plan is such a pathetic farce...and can tell me what she's going to do about it. More to the point, McKinney has Important Papers from an Important Court of Law that says he's not a drug user. Thus, he can say, along with any other candidate but with more authority, "I don't drink and I don't do drugs." Of course, that's the Earl Long defense. When Gov. Long got out of the Louisiana State Insane Asylum, he proudly waived his discharge papers and refused to resign from office: "I got papers says I'm not crazy! You got papers?" So: Tim McKinney has papers that say he's clean and sober, and we can believe that he's clean and sober. We can also believe he's been an effective mayor because we can see that Berryville's departments and systems work well. He deserves another term for both reasons. But let's hope it's going to be his last. McKinney has been mayor since 1991 which, along with Fidel Castro and Little Dick in Chicago, makes him one of the longest serving public officials in the Universe (as, of course, we know it). For much of the past 20 years, there has been little debate about the how and why of Berryville's operations, or about its plans for the future. That isn't McKinney's fault: for democracy to work it needs at least a few bad old boys willing to give the good old boys a run for our money. But where, oh where, are the bad old boys? For the simple sake of democracy, let's hope that a few prospective leaders begin to emerge soon. Personally, I don't care if they take a drink now and then. Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
Ubiquitous is a word that means "everywhere." We all know that there are lots of pigs in the world. Some good pigs like Wilbur in Charlotte's Web...and some bad pigs too, like the pigs in Orwell's Animal Farm.
I have a picture of a beautiful Yorkshire hog diving off a board into a pretty county pond. The pig is smiling. He is a good pig. Good pigs are everywhere. Happy, friendly, useful pigs.
And then there are the bad pigs. Remember when you mother admonished you? "Don't be a pig!" she'd command. She was telling you not to be selfish, and to think of other people. Your mom (and my mom) hoped that we would consider the feelings and rights of other people.
This blog is about good things and bad things: good and bad things happening in Carroll County, good and bad books, good and bad food. Thanks for taking a look.
Hot topics Godspeed, Paul & Marie Andresen(0 ~ 11:49 AM, Sep 1)
How to Write a Grant
Fresh!
Red State vs. Blue State
Good Old Boys...and Bad Old Boys
|
Tim McKinney's papers only say he was clean and sober long enough to pass a pee test. It says nothing about 5 minutes after the test or today. You can not take one point in time and extrapolate it to eternity. I have no idea if Tim McKinney is clean and sober today or not but your rationale is absurd.
I appreciate your reading my blog and commenting; I never know if folks see these things or if they just go into the wind.
You are more or less correct about the usefulness of drug tests since usefulness varies from about 12 hours to 45 days depending on a lot of factors including amounts ingested, type of substance, and the physical characteristics of the person being tested. Courts, apparently, find them useful since they rely on them heavily in cases such as McKinney's. Similarly, sports teams, airline companies...etc.
Ultimately, it becomes a matter of trust. Do you trust the drug test process? Do you trust the person being tested?
Anyway, thanks again for reading the blog and for your very good comment.